What Happened to Trader Joe's FACTA Class Action Settlement (Keim v. Trader Joe's Company)?
Trader Joe's faced a class action lawsuit, *Keim v. Trader Joe's Company*, alleging violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) by printing too many credit or debit card digits on customer receipts between March and July 2019. The grocery chain agreed to a $7.4 million settlement, which received preliminary approval in February 2026, with a claim deadline of June 9, 2026, and a final approval hearing scheduled for August 10, 2026.
Quick Answer
The Trader Joe's lawsuit, specifically the *Keim v. Trader Joe's Company* class action, concerned allegations that the company violated the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) by printing the first six and last four digits of customer credit/debit card numbers on receipts. Trader Joe's settled the case for $7.4 million, without admitting wrongdoing. As of June 2026, eligible customers who made purchases between March 5, 2019, and July 19, 2019, have until June 9, 2026, to file a claim for an estimated payout of $102.45, with a final court approval hearing set for August 10, 2026.
📊Key Facts
📅Complete Timeline13 events
FACTA Enacted
The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) is enacted, establishing rules for truncating credit and debit card numbers on printed receipts to protect consumer privacy.
Start of Alleged Violation Period
Trader Joe's allegedly began printing more than the last five digits of credit/debit card numbers on customer receipts due to payment processing software issues at select locations.
End of Alleged Violation Period
The period during which Trader Joe's receipts allegedly displayed excessive credit/debit card information concluded.
Lawsuit Initially Filed
Plaintiff Brian Keim files a class action lawsuit against Trader Joe's, alleging violations of FACTA, initially in Florida.
Lawsuit Transferred to California
The class action lawsuit, *Keim v. Trader Joe's Company*, is transferred and filed in California, where Trader Joe's is headquartered.
Preliminary Settlement Approval
A tentative $7.4 million settlement between Trader Joe's and the plaintiff receives preliminary approval from the court.
Settlement News Widely Reported
News outlets begin widely reporting on the Trader Joe's FACTA settlement, detailing eligibility and the claim process for affected customers.
ClassAction.org Reports Settlement Details
ClassAction.org provides detailed information on the preliminary approval of the $7.4 million settlement, including estimated payouts and the claim deadline.
Food Network Explains Eligibility
Food Network publishes an article explaining the lawsuit, the FACTA law, and who is eligible to receive a payout from the settlement.
Final Reminder for Claim Deadline
Fast Company publishes an article reminding shoppers that they have only days left to file claims for the Trader Joe's settlement, detailing the estimated payout.
Claim Filing Deadline
This is the final deadline for eligible class members to submit a valid claim form, or to opt out or object to the settlement.
Final Approval Hearing
A final approval hearing is scheduled for the $7.4 million settlement, where a judge will make the ultimate determination on whether to officially approve the agreement.
Estimated Payout Distribution
Assuming final court approval and no appeals, settlement payments are estimated to begin approximately 45 days after the August 10th hearing.
🔍Deep Dive Analysis
The class action lawsuit, formally known as Keim v. Trader Joe's Company, originated from allegations that the popular grocery chain violated the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA). FACTA, an amendment to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, mandates that businesses truncate credit and debit card numbers on electronically printed receipts, displaying no more than the last five digits to protect consumer privacy and prevent identity theft. The lawsuit, initially filed by plaintiff Brian Keim in Florida in 2019, claimed that Trader Joe's receipts, specifically between March 5, 2019, and July 19, 2019, displayed the first six and last four digits of customers' card numbers, exceeding the legal limit.
Trader Joe's, while denying any wrongdoing and stating it was unaware of any identity theft incidents resulting from the receipt formatting, ultimately agreed to a settlement to avoid further litigation. The company attributed the issue to its payment processing software at select locations during the specified 18-week period. This decision to settle is a common strategy for companies facing class action lawsuits, allowing them to resolve claims without admitting liability.
A significant turning point occurred in February 2026 when the company and the plaintiff reached a tentative $7.4 million settlement, which subsequently received preliminary court approval on February 5, 2026. This settlement fund is intended to cover payments to eligible class members, the plaintiff's award, and attorneys' fees. The estimated individual payout for eligible claimants is approximately $102.45, though this amount could fluctuate based on the total number of valid claims submitted and the deduction of legal and administrative costs.
The consequences of this lawsuit are directly impacting hundreds of thousands of consumers across the United States. Eligible individuals who made purchases at Trader Joe's stores using a credit or debit card during the affected period (March 5, 2019, to July 19, 2019) and received a non-compliant receipt are entitled to file a claim. The deadline for class members to submit a valid claim form, or to opt out or object to the settlement, is June 9, 2026.
As of June 9, 2026, the settlement is in its final stages of approval. A final approval hearing is scheduled for August 10, 2026, where a judge will make the ultimate determination on whether to officially approve the agreement. If approved and no appeals arise, payments are expected to be distributed approximately 45 days after the final approval. Any remaining funds after the initial distribution may be used for a second distribution or donated to the Identity Theft Resource Center. This case highlights the ongoing importance of consumer protection laws like FACTA in safeguarding personal financial information.
What If...?
Explore alternate histories. What if Trader Joe's FACTA Class Action Settlement (Keim v. Trader Joe's Company) made different choices?